The Motor Forum Forum Index The Motor Forum
"We are mature men in the highest cadres of our careers"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

2017 Volvo XC-60

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Motor Forum Forum Index -> Read All About It
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Please Register and Login to this forum to stop seeing this advertising.






Posted:     Post subject:

Back to top
Chris M Wanted a V-10
Supercharged

My Car: C-Max'D, CapturD and GOK the Wok

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 7160


Location: Captur'd by 1 5UMO near Camberley. Forum F1 champ 2011 and 2015

PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:18 am    Post subject: 2017 Volvo XC-60  Reply with quote

Unveiling in Geneva on 07 March 2017 starting 9:45am UK time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp6Jbih2nRY
_________________
Wanted a V-10 ; settled for half a V-6
October 2012:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
PhilD
Nuclear

My Car: Fiat Grande Punto Sporting

Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 15807



PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well wasn't that exciting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michael
Nuclear

My Car: is vast.

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 10367


Location: On the hill

PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does have the look of being rear-ended, the nose seeming out of proportion with the rest of it.
_________________
For office use only.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BeN
The Motor, Singapore branch.

My Car: Toyota Prius
View My Motor: .

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 11309


Location: Singapore

PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 12:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doesn't look very different...?



Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
PhilD
Nuclear

My Car: Fiat Grande Punto Sporting

Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 15807



PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Racing Teatray
Nuclear

My Car: BMW 440i GC and Fiat 500

Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 12819


Location: Wrong side of the tracks

PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 1:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, so do I. Volvo's new design language is attractive. Odd though that the cab-back, long bonnet profile should be applied to a car that will never pack more than four cylinders...
_________________
'Bahnwafting...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scouse
Turbocharged

My Car: Volvo XC60/Ford Fiesta/Jaguar XJ

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 3591


Location: Ormskirk, Lancashire

PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

+1 from me.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dr. Hfuhruhurr
Propellorhead

My Car: Mini Countryman Cooper S All4

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 15518


Location: Europa

PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The lower side moulding looks as though it would fit in the recess in the doors!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PhilD
Nuclear

My Car: Fiat Grande Punto Sporting

Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 15807



PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dr. Hfuhruhurr wrote:
The lower side moulding looks as though it would fit in the recess in the doors!


It's like a reflection in a still pool.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris M Wanted a V-10
Supercharged

My Car: C-Max'D, CapturD and GOK the Wok

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 7160


Location: Captur'd by 1 5UMO near Camberley. Forum F1 champ 2011 and 2015

PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I almost like it, maybe familiarity with the shape will enhance my opinion?
The wheels and wheel arches do look enormous in the first set of photos released.
The long bonnet, whilst a Volvo tradition, must surely compromise cabin space.
http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news...volvo-xc60-set-take-jaguar-f-pace
_________________
Wanted a V-10 ; settled for half a V-6
October 2012:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Giant
Supercharged

My Car: It's an Astra. Zzz...

Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 5645



PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is that the fuel filler on the front wing?!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris M Wanted a V-10
Supercharged

My Car: C-Max'D, CapturD and GOK the Wok

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 7160


Location: Captur'd by 1 5UMO near Camberley. Forum F1 champ 2011 and 2015

PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

^ No, the charging point for the plug-in/hybrid versions
_________________
Wanted a V-10 ; settled for half a V-6
October 2012:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
PG
Nuclear

My Car: Jaaaag XFR; Shogun "truck"; Peugeot horse "van"

Joined: 23 Dec 2006
Posts: 10156


Location: Shropshire

PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Giant wrote:
Is that the fuel filler on the front wing?!


I wondered that too. Or a charging point for the hybrid?

Re the long bonnet - is it transverse of longitudinal engined? If transverse, then it is very long indeed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PhilD
Nuclear

My Car: Fiat Grande Punto Sporting

Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 15807



PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PG wrote:
Giant wrote:
Is that the fuel filler on the front wing?!


I wondered that too. Or a charging point for the hybrid?

Re the long bonnet - is it transverse of longitudinal engined? If transverse, then it is very long indeed.


It's for pedestrian safety. One of these pops out if you hit anyone.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Blarno
Cheapskate Know-it-all

My Car: The Flying Glacier Mint

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 17038


Location: The Shores of Hell

PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's a modern Volvo, it'll be transverse.
_________________
Sphincteral Twitch: Debut EP "Disastrous Rectal Misfortune" work in progress.

Morbid Obesity: Debut album "Shallow Gravy" due...work in progress.

Spiderpuncher - A seedy trip into electro industrial madness.

Pathway - Punk. Loud. Probably crap.

Giant wrote:
Blarno is right
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nelson
Petrolhead

My Car: Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Titanium X

Joined: 23 Dec 2006
Posts: 1581


Location: Rugby

PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 8:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

that's very handsome, and very desirable and even the new rear lights design actually works well on this (whereas them on the S90 look an abomination and looks like its been sat on). Interior is very smart, it's the first car I can actually say that the touchscreen looks a great piece and easy to use as shows everything in large clear format, though for me it should have separate heating controls.

Like it
_________________
I'm quite happy doing this if you'd like to sod off
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roadsterstu
Nuclear

My Car: threelitreturbosixallwheeldrive

Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 12728


Location: Over there.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 2:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Racing Teatray wrote:
Yes, so do I. Volvo's new design language is attractive. Odd though that the cab-back, long bonnet profile should be applied to a car that will never pack more than four cylinders...


Yes. A bit BMW like. However, that's where the S/V90 have headed as well.

I do rather like that. It's a nice update of the Volvo design language and, given just how many newish Volvo cars I now see on the roads, they must be doing something right. This bodes well for the next V60. Just a slight shame about the 4 cylinder future. That said, the power outputs are impressive.
_________________
T6
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dr. Hfuhruhurr
Propellorhead

My Car: Mini Countryman Cooper S All4

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 15518


Location: Europa

PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Roadsterstu wrote:
Just a slight shame about the 4 cylinder future. That said, the power outputs are impressive.

It'll be interesting to see if there's a backlash once new emission tests start to show that these downsized turbo engines aren't all that efficient in real-world use.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roadsterstu
Nuclear

My Car: threelitreturbosixallwheeldrive

Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 12728


Location: Over there.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 9:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dr. Hfuhruhurr wrote:
Roadsterstu wrote:
Just a slight shame about the 4 cylinder future. That said, the power outputs are impressive.

It'll be interesting to see if there's a backlash once new emission tests start to show that these downsized turbo engines aren't all that efficient in real-world use.


I wonder what percentage of buyers really care about them having less than 5 or 6 cylinders? We do, naturally.
_________________
T6
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dr. Hfuhruhurr
Propellorhead

My Car: Mini Countryman Cooper S All4

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 15518


Location: Europa

PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 9:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I remember at Geneva the year they launched the C Class, I was talking one of their sales people along with an owner of a previous model. He was basically saying he wasn't interested unless they came up with a version with a six cylinder engine (he'd had a C350). I told her the same thing.

I think at so-called premium level, people do care about this stuff. Volvo had a real USP with the five, just as BMW did with inline sixes; you abandon that kind of heritage at your peril, because eventually people start to ask why they should buy your car instead of a competitor, and you don't really have an answer other than monthly lease payments (which your rivals will be going all out to match).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michael
Nuclear

My Car: is vast.

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 10367


Location: On the hill

PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 10:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd suggest a motor show sample would be disproportionately 'enthusiast' compared to the general public. I'd have the T8 XC90 as it is. The power is there and the technology is interesting which I think is becoming more of a lever for buyers. The mainstream days of beyond four cyclinders are over.
_________________
For office use only.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dr. Hfuhruhurr
Propellorhead

My Car: Mini Countryman Cooper S All4

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 15518


Location: Europa

PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 11:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've read very mixed reviews of the T8, and I firmly believe that "big engines are over" is propaganda from the people who'd have you believe that diesel engines are clean because their CO2 figures are low.

There was a comment in evo that the 718 they tested had a lifetime mpg under 20 - so we gave up the flat sixes for sub-20 mpg? My GT3 did almost 30 mpg in the UK - the worst I managed was an Autobahn strop at 150 mph or more that burned through a tankful at 19 mpg. The idea that these small overstressed turbo engines are super efficient is a blatant lie.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Giant
Supercharged

My Car: It's an Astra. Zzz...

Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 5645



PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 1:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The lie being we've foisted 4cyls on you for added efficiency, rather than for reduced costs/additional profit. Doesn't mean the result is different.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris M Wanted a V-10
Supercharged

My Car: C-Max'D, CapturD and GOK the Wok

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 7160


Location: Captur'd by 1 5UMO near Camberley. Forum F1 champ 2011 and 2015

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 8:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dr. Hfuhruhurr wrote:
..... I firmly believe that "big engines are over" is propaganda from the people who'd have you believe that diesel engines are clean because their CO2 figures are low.

It's all political from scum-bag politicians. Why don't they tackle pollution from ships, for example, or planes whose fuel is still generally tax-free and whose emissions go direct into the upper atmosphere?
Because motorists are easy, soft targets and they love to play around with us, taxing us to the hilt, leaving us down one path then changing their minds and shafting us all when they do so with huge tax hikes.  How can you build long-term stability if, for example, you are making diesel engines since one minute we are encouraged to buy them due to low CO2 emissions, then next minute they are evil (in the eyes of the politicians) due to particulates?
_________________
Wanted a V-10 ; settled for half a V-6
October 2012:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Twelfth Monkey
Nuclear

My Car: B7 RS4 Saloon, A3 Sportback 2.0T

Joined: 23 Dec 2006
Posts: 14462


Location: The Fortress of Ultimate Darkness; that or the pub.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 9:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dr. Hfuhruhurr wrote:
I've read very mixed reviews of the T8, and I firmly believe that "big engines are over" is propaganda from the people who'd have you believe that diesel engines are clean because their CO2 figures are low.

There was a comment in evo that the 718 they tested had a lifetime mpg under 20 - so we gave up the flat sixes for sub-20 mpg? My GT3 did almost 30 mpg in the UK - the worst I managed was an Autobahn strop at 150 mph or more that burned through a tankful at 19 mpg. The idea that these small overstressed turbo engines are super efficient is a blatant lie.


On a longer run, the only distances over which I can comment, the consumption from mine isn't that different from Mrs 12th's 2l 4-pot turbo.
_________________
"Accident Blackspot"? These aren't accidents. They're throwing themselves into the road gladly. Throwing themselves into the road to escape all this hideousness.'

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Martin
Nuclear

My Car: BMW 535d M Sport & Boxster 987.2

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 14425


Location: Higham Ferrers

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 9:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dr. Hfuhruhurr wrote:
There was a comment in evo that the 718 they tested had a lifetime mpg under 20 - so we gave up the flat sixes for sub-20 mpg? My GT3 did almost 30 mpg in the UK - the worst I managed was an Autobahn strop at 150 mph or more that burned through a tankful at 19 mpg. The idea that these small overstressed turbo engines are super efficient is a blatant lie.


The overal average for the Boxster is 28mpg and it doesn't do many long motorway journeys.  I'm not sure it would be possible to average 20mpg on the road without being a complete idiot and it will easily do mid to high 30s on a gentle run.

Turbos seem to be blamed for relatively poor economy, but it is more about engine size, we've seen some excelllent numbers from long runs in the forums M135is as an example.  Turbocharged engines do seem to have a wider range based on how they're driven, I could get low 30s out of mine if I tried, but thanks to fairly heavy but flowing traffic on the way home last night, it did 50mpg.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michael
Nuclear

My Car: is vast.

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 10367


Location: On the hill

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 9:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dr. Hfuhruhurr wrote:
I've read very mixed reviews of the T8, and I firmly believe that "big engines are over" is propaganda from the people who'd have you believe that diesel engines are clean because their CO2 figures are low.

There was a comment in evo that the 718 they tested had a lifetime mpg under 20 - so we gave up the flat sixes for sub-20 mpg? My GT3 did almost 30 mpg in the UK - the worst I managed was an Autobahn strop at 150 mph or more that burned through a tankful at 19 mpg. The idea that these small overstressed turbo engines are super efficient is a blatant lie.


I've only read positive reviews of the T8 and my own experience of one was very positive. On longer runs, as described elsewhere, the economy would be dire but around town, as most are used, it's very good.
Economy is only part of it, however. Packaging and production cost are the greater influences here. Rightly or wrongly, the days of mainstream engines with many cylinders are over.
_________________
For office use only.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Boxer6
Twin-charged

My Car: Subaru Legacy Spec B.

Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 9172


Location: The dark recesses of my mind......

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 9:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chris M Wanted a V-10 wrote:
Dr. Hfuhruhurr wrote:
..... I firmly believe that "big engines are over" is propaganda from the people who'd have you believe that diesel engines are clean because their CO2 figures are low.

It's all political from scum-bag politicians. Why don't they tackle pollution from ships, for example, or planes whose fuel is still generally tax-free and whose emissions go direct into the upper atmosphere?
Because motorists are easy, soft targets and they love to play around with us, taxing us to the hilt, leaving us down one path then changing their minds and shafting us all when they do so with huge tax hikes.  How can you build long-term stability if, for example, you are making diesel engines since one minute we are encouraged to buy them due to low CO2 emissions, then next minute they are evil (in the eyes of the politicians) due to particulates?


It's been known and acknowledged for many years about the danger of diesel particulate emissions. What IS galling is the political viewpoint changing and their assurance it's for health/environmental reasons, when it's obvious to a blind man it's all about money. As always.
_________________
I'll wait up in the dark

For you to speak to me . . .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tim
Nuclear

My Car: is multiplying

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 13134


Location: Over the rainbow

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I read that the Fiat Coupe was more fuel efficient as a 5 pot than a 4 pot - despite being 35BHP more powerful.
It was also no more efficient than the 3.2 in the Alfa GT.

Marti, I'm amazed you can get much into the 30s with the Boxster - it just shows to me that there is still plenty of 'life' in pursuing increased efficiency with existing engines rather than chasing it with newer, more technical engines that to my mind have more bits that can go wrong in later years.

There's no point in making a car 20% more efficient if its going to get to, say, 10 years old and then get 'thrown away'.
A less efficient car that lasts 15 years will be better.

Wasn't there a report a few years ago that said the Jeep Cherokee was the least polluting car when all emissions including building and transportation were included?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michael
Nuclear

My Car: is vast.

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 10367


Location: On the hill

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 12:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tim wrote:
years ago that said the Jeep Cherokee was the least polluting car when all emissions including building and transportation were included?


The Dust to Dust report, it was the Wrangler but there is very little to them.
_________________
For office use only.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JohnC
Supercharged

My Car: 435D Coupe

Joined: 23 Dec 2006
Posts: 5098


Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I read somewhere recently that cars only account for 11% of the NOx emissions whereas central heating etc accounts for nearly 40%. Aircraft and ships account for nearly a third and I can't remember what the rest was.

The bottom line is that even if you slash car NOx emissions in half, you have made an inconsequential impact.

Money should be spent to ensure that it is a requirement for all new houses to have at least one aspect of their roof made of solar tiles and possibly heat pumps installed in all new developments. We will have to move towards electric heating in houses and it is surely better to start putting the infrastructure in place now than wait until it is too late.
_________________
Every man is the architect of his own future.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tim
Nuclear

My Car: is multiplying

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 13134


Location: Over the rainbow

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JohnC wrote:
I read somewhere recently that cars only account for 11% of the NOx emissions whereas central heating etc accounts for nearly 40%. Aircraft and ships account for nearly a third and I can't remember what the rest was.

The bottom line is that even if you slash car NOx emissions in half, you have made an inconsequential impact.

Money should be spent to ensure that it is a requirement for all new houses to have at least one aspect of their roof made of solar tiles and possibly heat pumps installed in all new developments. We will have to move towards electric heating in houses and it is surely better to start putting the infrastructure in place now than wait until it is too late.


There was something about that on the BBC website at the beginning of the week.

I think the 11% was a London figure - that's where most info is from - but the article still managed to come around to the idea that cars should be taxed more  
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tim
Nuclear

My Car: is multiplying

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 13134


Location: Over the rainbow

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tax cars a bit more and ignore the major causes of the problem.
Article here.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-38979754
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bob Sacamano
Nuclear

My Car: BMW 320d M Sport Auto

Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 11884



PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's the bleedin' hipsters with their friggin' wood burning stoves I tell you!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PhilD
Nuclear

My Car: Fiat Grande Punto Sporting

Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 15807



PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 5:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bob Sacamano wrote:
It's the bleedin' hipsters with their friggin' wood burning stoves I tell you!


Ever since you mentioned this I can smell these bleeding things everywhere!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bob Sacamano
Nuclear

My Car: BMW 320d M Sport Auto

Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 11884



PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PhilD wrote:
Bob Sacamano wrote:
It's the bleedin' hipsters with their friggin' wood burning stoves I tell you!


Ever since you mentioned this I can smell these bleeding things everywhere!


A single wood burning stove emits as much PM2.5 (the really dangerous particles) in a year as a 1000 petrol cars.

http://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h2757/rr-1

They are probably the main reason why, despite all attempts to clean up London's air, it's getting worse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tim
Nuclear

My Car: is multiplying

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 13134


Location: Over the rainbow

PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 10:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

We had a wood burning stove in one of our houses and it was particularly inefficient, smelly and just a complete pain.
It was only rarely used.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roadsterstu
Nuclear

My Car: threelitreturbosixallwheeldrive

Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 12728


Location: Over there.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JohnC wrote:
I read somewhere recently that cars only account for 11% of the NOx emissions whereas central heating etc accounts for nearly 40%. Aircraft and ships account for nearly a third and I can't remember what the rest was.

The bottom line is that even if you slash car NOx emissions in half, you have made an inconsequential impact.

Money should be spent to ensure that it is a requirement for all new houses to have at least one aspect of their roof made of solar tiles and possibly heat pumps installed in all new developments. We will have to move towards electric heating in houses and it is surely better to start putting the infrastructure in place now than wait until it is too late.


Aircraft, naturally, burn up a lot of fuel but are getting ever more efficient. Shipping, though, produces horrific amounts of pollution.
_________________
T6
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Twelfth Monkey
Nuclear

My Car: B7 RS4 Saloon, A3 Sportback 2.0T

Joined: 23 Dec 2006
Posts: 14462


Location: The Fortress of Ultimate Darkness; that or the pub.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Water's nearly 800 times denser than air, and the masses involved are obviously huge.
_________________
"Accident Blackspot"? These aren't accidents. They're throwing themselves into the road gladly. Throwing themselves into the road to escape all this hideousness.'

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Scouse
Turbocharged

My Car: Volvo XC60/Ford Fiesta/Jaguar XJ

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 3591


Location: Ormskirk, Lancashire

PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 1:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Roadsterstu wrote:
JohnC wrote:
I read somewhere recently that cars only account for 11% of the NOx emissions whereas central heating etc accounts for nearly 40%. Aircraft and ships account for nearly a third and I can't remember what the rest was.

The bottom line is that even if you slash car NOx emissions in half, you have made an inconsequential impact.

Money should be spent to ensure that it is a requirement for all new houses to have at least one aspect of their roof made of solar tiles and possibly heat pumps installed in all new developments. We will have to move towards electric heating in houses and it is surely better to start putting the infrastructure in place now than wait until it is too late.


Aircraft, naturally, burn up a lot of fuel but are getting ever more efficient. Shipping, though, produces horrific amounts of pollution.


Indeed, but at least they used heavy fuel oil for the really big stuff, which meant we used more of each barrel of oil.


_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Motor Forum Forum Index -> Read All About It All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum