| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Apex clipper Turbocharged
 My Car: Is now fixededed...
Joined: 11 Oct 2007 Posts: 3495
Location: Worcester..sauce..shire.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| TimR wrote: | Weird.
What's the gearing in 5th? |
If I wasn't at this point trying to accelerate up a slight incline ( read: North face of the Eigar)
It's barely registering! About 800rpm!! _________________ Minky Moo & Millie Maloo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SpecB Turbocharged
 My Car: Subaru Legacy 3.0R SpecB
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 Posts: 3107
Location: Home, office, the stables or somewhere in between.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SpecB wrote: | | Boxer6 wrote: | | SpecB wrote: | Just got around to doing this.
I haven't got a through the gears time yet but 5th took 11.24 and 6th took 13 for the manual SpecB. |
Means my 12.14 in 5th pretty much splits your two times Mark. Did you use SportSharp, as I did?
Be interesting to see your through-the-gears times too. |
Yes, Sport#. I will hopefully do the through gears tomorrow. |
OK, did the 30-60 through 2nd and 3rd and it did it in 4s dead. Doing it in 3rd alone added a second. If it could actually get to 60 in 2nd then it would be even quicker. I'm quite impressed with that TBH. _________________
Mark |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
"him" Turbocharged
 My Car: is 'wikkid innit' & '04 Scenic Dynamique
Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 4860
Location: Cornwall
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SpecB wrote: | | OK, did the 30-60 through 2nd and 3rd and it did it in 4s dead. Doing it in 3rd alone added a second. If it could actually get to 60 in 2nd then it would be even quicker. I'm quite impressed with that TBH. |
Those are good times for what is quite a heavy car, the change into 3rd would have cost you some time...
I will get the figures added to the table soon! _________________ Remember - A gym without chalk is a heath spa... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SpecB Turbocharged
 My Car: Subaru Legacy 3.0R SpecB
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 Posts: 3107
Location: Home, office, the stables or somewhere in between.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| "him" wrote: | | SpecB wrote: | | OK, did the 30-60 through 2nd and 3rd and it did it in 4s dead. Doing it in 3rd alone added a second. If it could actually get to 60 in 2nd then it would be even quicker. I'm quite impressed with that TBH. |
Those are good times for what is quite a heavy car, the change into 3rd would have cost you some time...
I will get the figures added to the table soon! |
Well it's heavy compared to your Saxo! It's about 1550kg which I don't think is too bad for the size of car with AWD. I am betting that if it could do 60 in 2nd then another half a second could be shaved off. _________________
Mark |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Boxer6 Turbocharged
 My Car: Subaru Legacy 3.0R Spec B Sports Tourer (Auto)
Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 3282
Location: What's it called?
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SpecB wrote: | | "him" wrote: | | SpecB wrote: | | OK, did the 30-60 through 2nd and 3rd and it did it in 4s dead. Doing it in 3rd alone added a second. If it could actually get to 60 in 2nd then it would be even quicker. I'm quite impressed with that TBH. |
Those are good times for what is quite a heavy car, the change into 3rd would have cost you some time...
I will get the figures added to the table soon! |
Well it's heavy compared to your Saxo! It's about 1550kg which I don't think is too bad for the size of car with AWD. I am betting that if it could do 60 in 2nd then another half a second could be shaved off. |
I thought I'd seen the given weight of mine as 2250kg all up. Must go and check...... _________________ Just keepin' on keeping on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SpecB Turbocharged
 My Car: Subaru Legacy 3.0R SpecB
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 Posts: 3107
Location: Home, office, the stables or somewhere in between.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That might be the gross vehicle weight which is the maximum fully loaded.
Edit: Kerb weight of the new ones are 1560 (which is near enough what I thought) for the manual, 1570 for the auto and maximum weight 2050. _________________
Mark |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Boxer6 Turbocharged
 My Car: Subaru Legacy 3.0R Spec B Sports Tourer (Auto)
Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 3282
Location: What's it called?
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SpecB wrote: | That might be the gross vehicle weight which is the maximum fully loaded.
Edit: Kerb weight of the new ones are 1560 (which is near enough what I thought) for the manual, 1570 for the auto and maximum weight 2050. |
Yep - just found that myself!! _________________ Just keepin' on keeping on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
. Dieselhead
My Car: .
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 7595
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Martin wrote: | | Torque Junkie wrote: | Interesting times Martin for Patsy.
Having driven that hateful 2.0TDI Leon alot recently, it just doesn't feel any quicker than mine - which I would expect it to do given the power it should have (Don't think the 150 bhp fairy visited the engine that day...) plus the 6 ratios it has. |
You should ask for your money back on your remap!
|
And go even slower, not a chance while its going as quick as it is, which for a 1.8 Diesel, isn't bad. More so when your engine is modern and mine is based on quite an old design now. As I said, perhaps this Leon doesn't have one of these more potent VAG 2.0TDI you talk of, coz it really is a dissapointment on all fronts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martin Supercharged
 My Car: BMW 520d M Sport & MINI Clubman Cooper S
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5351
Location: Swindon
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you sure it's a 2.0TDI not a 1.9TDI? The 2.0TDI isn't the most refined diesel you can buy but it makes the 1.9 sound like a tractor. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
. Dieselhead
My Car: .
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 7595
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Driven both and can tell the difference. Not that stooooooooooopid. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martin Supercharged
 My Car: BMW 520d M Sport & MINI Clubman Cooper S
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5351
Location: Swindon
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Torque Junkie wrote: | | Driven both and can tell the difference. Not that stooooooooooopid. |
Must.......not.......respond.......  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PR Twin-charged
 My Car: -o--o-
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 9776
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Never mind, Martin. I took Mike out in the 130i last week and even he conceded that it was 'quite good' or something like that!  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martin Supercharged
 My Car: BMW 520d M Sport & MINI Clubman Cooper S
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5351
Location: Swindon
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've just been looking through the videos and there has been some rounding on some of the the times and a little cheating. I thought the rules were to hold it at 30 rather than let the speed drop a little and thus remove any lag from the equation? If not, I'm going to figure the Passat again and drop a few tenths!!
It's a bit sad, but according to the timing device I used, Frank Bullitt and Him have been rounding the times up, Mike and GZ have been rounding down, Dradus and Kraft are spot on.
FB's time in 4th is 8.6 and Mikes in 4th is 9.6, so not quicker than a 325i after all!! By my calculations, Him's time in 3rd is 5.0 sec so gets moved a couple of places up. The D5 is still very (surprisingly) quick, but 12th may be relieved to know that it's not quite as quick as his RS4! I get 5.9 in 4th and 4.7 in 3rd.
The answer is yes....I'm bored! _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
"him" Turbocharged
 My Car: is 'wikkid innit' & '04 Scenic Dynamique
Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 4860
Location: Cornwall
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Martin wrote: | | It's a bit sad, but according to the timing device I used, Frank Bullitt and Him have been rounding the times up, Mike and GZ have been rounding down, Dradus and Kraft are spot on... |
I always "err" on the side of caution for my own times, but am prepared to give the benefit of the doubt for others...
I only allowed myself a time to the nearest 1/2 a second and rounded up, anything less using the equipment I was using is stretching credibility...  _________________ Remember - A gym without chalk is a heath spa... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martin Supercharged
 My Car: BMW 520d M Sport & MINI Clubman Cooper S
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5351
Location: Swindon
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was using official timing by Nokia!!!
I might time the Passat again from about 25 and only start the clock at 30, because that rule was just put in to handicap the TDI boys!!! _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
"him" Turbocharged
 My Car: is 'wikkid innit' & '04 Scenic Dynamique
Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 4860
Location: Cornwall
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Martin wrote: | | ...I might time the Passat again from about 25 and only start the clock at 30, because that rule was just put in to handicap the TDI boys!!! |
Handicap the TDI boys...? If we timed from 25mph you would still have the turbo lag to take into account...
But if we are talking a "run at it", why not start at 10mph, and (I don't know) stop at 100mph?  _________________ Remember - A gym without chalk is a heath spa... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martin Supercharged
 My Car: BMW 520d M Sport & MINI Clubman Cooper S
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5351
Location: Swindon
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It takes a fraction of a second between pressing the throttle and getting maximum push in every diesel I've driven, (non turbo?) petrol engined cars obviously don't have that.
I don't mind the run to 100, providing it's done in the same gear, it's the starting from 20 I don't fancy!! 50-100 in 5th would be fine, but I would prefer 40-80/90 in 4th! _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Apex clipper Turbocharged
 My Car: Is now fixededed...
Joined: 11 Oct 2007 Posts: 3495
Location: Worcester..sauce..shire.
|
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
AHHHH!
It now becomes obviously clear that I should head the 5th gear table.
Rounding up..rounding down..willy waving...??
Tis just a bit of fun.
*I'd need to drop well below 30mph and a couple of gears to get anywhere near the top of the 5th gear chart.
I was honest and angelic in my timing...do I win owt? A pork pie? _________________ Minky Moo & Millie Maloo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Apex clipper Turbocharged
 My Car: Is now fixededed...
Joined: 11 Oct 2007 Posts: 3495
Location: Worcester..sauce..shire.
|
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Martin wrote: | It takes a fraction of a second between pressing the throttle and getting maximum push in every diesel I've driven, (non turbo?) petrol engined cars obviously don't have that.
I don't mind the run to 100, providing it's done in the same gear, it's the starting from 20 I don't fancy!! 50-100 in 5th would be fine, but I would prefer 40-80/90 in 4th! |
Now we've just proposing what we think (Or know) is the sweet spot for our respective chariots.
*Thinks...
**Discounts anything involving 5th gear and low revs.**
30- a ton in 3rd??
Wasn't everyone..holding the gear at bang on 30 the hitting the back of the accelerator into the shagpile??
If you weren't..  _________________ Minky Moo & Millie Maloo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TimR Supercharged
 My Car: Fiat Coupe Turbo, BMW E39 M5
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5096
Location: On the hard shoulder
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I held the car at 30 and started the timing when I pressed the throttle.
I reckon that costs a few tenths compared with taking a run at it, especially for the turbo cars. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
"him" Turbocharged
 My Car: is 'wikkid innit' & '04 Scenic Dynamique
Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 4860
Location: Cornwall
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Apex clipper wrote: | | Wasn't everyone..holding the gear at bang on 30 the hitting the back of the accelerator into the shagpile?? |
| Someone really dull wrote: | | If everyone can time their car in 5th Gear, I think it will be best to cruise at a constant 30mph and then accelerate in 5th until 60mph is reached, rather than accelerate through 30mph from a lower speed. This will mean any turbo lag is recorded etc. |
By the way Tim, does the M5 pick up quickly compared to the Fiat? _________________ Remember - A gym without chalk is a heath spa...
Last edited by "him" on Mon Dec 22, 2008 5:59 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TimR Supercharged
 My Car: Fiat Coupe Turbo, BMW E39 M5
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5096
Location: On the hard shoulder
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Er.
If you mean does it respond quicker to the throttle then yes as there's no turbo lag*.
It pulls hard from about 1500rpm but it doesn't really get into it's stride until you're past 3k revs.
I actually forgot to engage Sport mode when I did the acceleration runs.
It doesn't give you more power or anything but sharpens the throttle response and adds steering weight.
*Considering the Fiat came out about 12 years ago it's surprisingly un-laggy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
. Dieselhead
My Car: .
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 7595
|
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Him, noticed a minor error with two of your graphs...which might upset someone!
The 3rd gear timings...i'm still below some people whom I faster than! Holy unfair.
But worse, you have labelled a certain BMW 325ti Sport Compact in Brown (For Diesel) and my own car in blue... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PR Twin-charged
 My Car: -o--o-
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 9776
|
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Torque Junkie wrote: | Him, noticed a minor error with two of your graphs...which might upset someone!
The 3rd gear timings...i'm still below some people whom I faster than! Holy unfair.
But worse, you have labelled a certain BMW 325ti Sport Compact in Brown (For Diesel) and my own car in blue... |
Yours is below mine because, well, 'tis the natural order of things!
I must object to being given a dieselly brown line though.
Unfortunately I didn't get round to figuring the 320d because I had to give it back sooner than expected. Mine feels faster but it's difficult to say. Maybe it just sounds faster! _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guitar Zero Turbocharged
 My Car: Monkey spunk moped
Joined: 30 Dec 2006 Posts: 3323
|
Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't have a stop watch - I used the time code on the video which is only in whole seconds - although I did say it was four and a bit rather than 4 seconds dead.
Quibbling over accuracy in this thread is a daft for 2 reasons :
1) Without a Racelogic V-Box GPS unit, confirming the exact speed and time taken to accelerate between speeds is impossible.
2) Not everyone has posted a video - so a few timings have the potential to be even more inaccurate than those based on video footage.
If you want to make this as meaningful as possible - then only video submissions should be accepted and the timing based on video footage should be carried out by a single adjudicator. _________________ Previous convictions :
2006 Focus ST 2.5
2001 BMW 520i
2002 Focus 2.0 zetec
1999 Fiat Punto |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jasper Turbocharged
 My Car: Is sitting just right.
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 2594
Location: Beyond the naughty step.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Am I too late to join the fun? _________________
| franki68 wrote: | | If I wasn't married already I would marry the r8. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TimR Supercharged
 My Car: Fiat Coupe Turbo, BMW E39 M5
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5096
Location: On the hard shoulder
|
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nah get stuck in.
I was going to figure my courtesy car today but I got bored waiting for it  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
"him" Turbocharged
 My Car: is 'wikkid innit' & '04 Scenic Dynamique
Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 4860
Location: Cornwall
|
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jasper wrote: | | Am I too late to join the fun? |
Of course not...  _________________ Remember - A gym without chalk is a heath spa... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jasper Turbocharged
 My Car: Is sitting just right.
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 2594
Location: Beyond the naughty step.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laddies and Gentlemen. I give you.........Volkswagen Transporter Sportline
Third gear and my reckoning 7 secs. Not bad for a van with about a second and a half of turbo lag. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
"him" Turbocharged
 My Car: is 'wikkid innit' & '04 Scenic Dynamique
Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 4860
Location: Cornwall
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That is good going... which engine does it have (no sound here in the office!) _________________ Remember - A gym without chalk is a heath spa... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jasper Turbocharged
 My Car: Is sitting just right.
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 2594
Location: Beyond the naughty step.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
174bhp and 295 lb/ft of torque. It's very addictive the massive wave for torque shoving you forward. _________________
| franki68 wrote: | | If I wasn't married already I would marry the r8. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Boxer6 Turbocharged
 My Car: Subaru Legacy 3.0R Spec B Sports Tourer (Auto)
Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 3282
Location: What's it called?
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is that the same van you had on Sunday, Jasper? Excellent time, whatever engine is in it!! _________________ Just keepin' on keeping on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jasper Turbocharged
 My Car: Is sitting just right.
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 2594
Location: Beyond the naughty step.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah it was, just sorry I never had time to give you guys a spin in it. _________________
| franki68 wrote: | | If I wasn't married already I would marry the r8. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Apex clipper Turbocharged
 My Car: Is now fixededed...
Joined: 11 Oct 2007 Posts: 3495
Location: Worcester..sauce..shire.
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 2:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excellent!
What figures are we doing in 2009 then? The first one to mention 5th get's a poke in the eye.
What about dithering along in 3rd at say..20mph..then seeing what the sandtimer murmers..at say a ton? Or 90..or even 50?
2nd gear....10> 50?
4th gear.. 40>110?
All power runs achieved on 'hims' exclusive test~track _________________ Minky Moo & Millie Maloo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martin Supercharged
 My Car: BMW 520d M Sport & MINI Clubman Cooper S
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5351
Location: Swindon
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I got some times from the MINI last night on a fairly quiet stretch of dual carriageway. A 50 lepton limit, but it was fine......
Fairly surprised by some of the times, but it is lower geared than the 130 (and miles lower than the Passat!). I tried every gear a second time on the way back, but tried in 3 time in 3rd gear because it didn't seem right. (but it was). I don't know how long the over boost works for, that would be interesting to know. It certainly doesn't have any turbo lag, in sport mode it picks up instantly as soon as you touch the throttle.
It does support my thoughts about it being pretty much as quick as the 130 at low revs / low speeds, but if it was a 80/90+ test then a 130 would give it a sound thrashing.
It's done just over 3,000 miles and all the reports suggest they get faster as the miles go on, so I need to crack on!!
Anyway, the average times for the MINI Clubman Cooper S are as follows:
3rd - 4.0 secs
4th - 6.3 secs
5th - 8.6 secs
6th - 10.0 secs _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
"him" Turbocharged
 My Car: is 'wikkid innit' & '04 Scenic Dynamique
Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 4860
Location: Cornwall
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good times Martin, I will get these times (and the others above) on the table tonight... (and correct the blue/brown lines!) _________________ Remember - A gym without chalk is a heath spa... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
. Dieselhead
My Car: .
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 7595
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Apex clipper wrote: | What figures are we doing in 2009 then? The first one to mention 5th get's a poke in the eye. |
Oh I know - 50 - 100 in 5th Gear!
Good figues Martin, whats the power/torque and vehicle weight? Didn't realise they would be that nippy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martin Supercharged
 My Car: BMW 520d M Sport & MINI Clubman Cooper S
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5351
Location: Swindon
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Torque Junkie wrote: | | Apex clipper wrote: | What figures are we doing in 2009 then? The first one to mention 5th get's a poke in the eye. |
Oh I know - 50 - 100 in 5th Gear!
Good figues Martin, whats the power/torque and vehicle weight? Didn't realise they would be that nippy! |
30-100 in 5th would be even more challenging!!
Power is 175hp and Torque is 192 lb-ft. Peak torque is from 1700 to 4500rpm, so acceleration is very linear which you can see from the numbers. That makes is feel a little slower than it actually is.
It weighs 1200kg, which is about 250kg less than the 130. So hp/tonne is well down (20%), but the torque to weight ratio is the same. The gearing is also shorter in the MINI, which obviously helps in this test.
Having said all that, the general consensus is that the Cooper S has a bit more power than stated. Evo put their last Cooper S on the Dyno and it had 205hp and David Vivian thought his Clubman S would have close to 200hp.
I've just bought the latest evo and the Cooper S they have tested against the 500 SS is much punchier than you'd think (0-100 in 16.6 and 30-70 in 5.7). It has a kerb weight of 1185kg I think, so not much less than the Clubman. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
"him" Turbocharged
 My Car: is 'wikkid innit' & '04 Scenic Dynamique
Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 4860
Location: Cornwall
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Martin wrote: | | 30-100 in 5th would be even more challenging!! |
30-100 is no problem...
20-100 in 5th?
I reckon a "roll on from" 10-100 through the gears would be interesting too, (to save any stress on the clutch/transmission)
I have updated the tables and times on the front page of the thread, please keep the times coming! _________________ Remember - A gym without chalk is a heath spa... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jasper Turbocharged
 My Car: Is sitting just right.
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 2594
Location: Beyond the naughty step.
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| "him" wrote: | | That is good going... which engine does it have (no sound here in the office!) |
For the first time I've heard the sound the engine makes on the video. Told you it sounds like EMCW.
I'm gonna do the Golf the next chance I get, just to find out how slow it is.
I don't know if it will do too badly, there;s no torque but I goes ok with a firm caning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GonnaBreakABuggy Turbocharged
 My Car: Peugeot 306
Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 3118
Location: Rotherham
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah bugger that, launch the fuckers from a standstill to 100.
*Pats Kevlar clutch plate*
*Wonders if it'll get to 100...* 
Last edited by GonnaBreakABuggy on Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:42 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jasper Turbocharged
 My Car: Is sitting just right.
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 2594
Location: Beyond the naughty step.
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah. If I can use Pats clutch I'll do it from a stand still too. _________________
| franki68 wrote: | | If I wasn't married already I would marry the r8. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SpecB Turbocharged
 My Car: Subaru Legacy 3.0R SpecB
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 Posts: 3107
Location: Home, office, the stables or somewhere in between.
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've yet to do a proper full bore start in mine in 30k miles. Planting right foot and simply dumping clutch seems so wrong mechanically despite Subaru limiting revs to 5k with the clutch down. _________________
Mark |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GonnaBreakABuggy Turbocharged
 My Car: Peugeot 306
Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 3118
Location: Rotherham
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can't just dump the clutch, I haven't got enough ponies!
4k slip for me  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TimR Supercharged
 My Car: Fiat Coupe Turbo, BMW E39 M5
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5096
Location: On the hard shoulder
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SpecB wrote: | | I've yet to do a proper full bore start in mine in 30k miles. Planting right foot and simply dumping clutch seems so wrong mechanically despite Subaru limiting revs to 5k with the clutch down. |
I tried something like it in the BM - not full throttle but enough - but with the traction control switched off (the day before new tyres were being fitted anyway).
Didn't seem all that quick but the haze of tyre smoke and black lines (I went back and had a look) were mighty impressive  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GonnaBreakABuggy Turbocharged
 My Car: Peugeot 306
Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 3118
Location: Rotherham
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's quicker if you're only just slipping the wheels rather than a full-bore burnout.
But not as much fun. _________________
*Innocent Whistle* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TimR Supercharged
 My Car: Fiat Coupe Turbo, BMW E39 M5
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5096
Location: On the hard shoulder
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Resident Spanner wrote: |
But not as much fun. |
Yup  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr. Hfuhruhurr Propellorhead
 My Car: pending
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 12122
Location: Europa
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Finally had a go at this yesterday, but I think I'll need a camera and stopwatch to time it properly. Suffice to say 27 - 64 mph in third takes about three seconds, and fourth is about the same. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Blarno Motorhead
 My Car: A homo's devil machine with Git Plate. Franc soon to be departed.
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 8449
Location: The corporate whore juggernaut
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought I was in 3rd, turns out I was in 4th. _________________ Arms held out, in the Jesus Christ Pose. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
. Dieselhead
My Car: .
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 7595
|
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I did a 50-100mph run, in 5th Gear this morning. On "him"'s private test track.
Its a smouldering time that I think people will really sturggle to beat, especially the likes of Nick and Tweflth in their tarted up Beetles and Audi S-Lines (Respectively).
So, the time, a mind blowing earth shattering and universe warping time of:
20.36secs. And a big black cloud of soot to boot.
It needs a service (Genuinely is does) plus 5th is a very tall gear. If I dropped to Fourth and hoofed it I reckon it would see it in about 16/17secs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|