ALF
|
FSD's on the AudiI have had the Koni FSD's fitted to the A4 now (on standard springs). Coincidentally, it was at the same mileage as when I had them fitted to the Alfa (44k), the main difference being that the Audi needed none of the suspension/ARB bushes replaced despite me asking them to check them all and replace as needed (on the Alfa, that doubled the price of this particular job).
Once again, the differences are marked. Not quite as massive as on the Alfa, which was appallingly under-damped on really rough roads at speed (though better on the motorway for that), but the comfort of the car is very substantially improved. It is a much more relaxing partner at all speeds, with smooth, relaxed, well damped vertical movements rather than the harsh jerky movements even on quite smooth surfaces that made the various S-Line or Sport-spec A3's, A4's and A5's I have experienced seem a lot less relaxing than they could have been. At motorway speeds, small bumps are heard more than felt, the sophisication of the damping feels very un-Audi.
I've only done a few hundred miles on them and no full-attack dry driving yet, but they seem an improvement there too. The car has slightly more body roll on turn-in, but it definitely communicates better as a result and is more to my tastes. Traction (especially in the wet) is better, and the dampers stiffen up when pressing on without ever starting off the savage pogo-stick vertical movements that the car suffered from before when pressing on on a really poor surface. The standard car was very grippy and well tied down on perfectly smooth surfaces, but throw it a typical British road and it was just too harshly damped.
Overall I'm very pleased. With the mileage I do, I need a good degree of comfort but don't want to compromise control when pressing on on a good road. Once again, my experience of the FSD's is that they do exactly what they say on the tin - provide a great compromise between both requirements, sort of like giving you the best bits of an SE and S-Line spec in one, without the downsides.
|
GonnaBreakABuggy
|
| Quote: | | The car has slightly more body roll on turn-in |
It always will do on the FSD's unless the previous dampers were dire at low speeds - they need an extra bleed hole in the piston to operate the FSD valve to pop the high speed circuit open, as you say though, that part of damping is very much down to personal choice.
|
JohnC
|
With all the criticism of the quality of Audi's ride and comfort on British roads you would think they would fit these dampers (or an Audi version of them) as standard.
|
ALF
|
You would. The car was good on the smooth stuff before though, and had very tied-down body control when really pressing on - the Audi dampers were a lot better than the standard Alfa ones, but really poorly specified for the UK. Although the A5 is supposed to be better, I still found it jiggly over the small stuff in Sport guise... I can't bear it when you go to press a button on the stereo, air con etc on the motorway and are jiggling up and down so much your finger is going one way and the dash the other!
|
Gurney
|
So they suit the Audi too, excellent news.
They are so popular for the GTAs that they are organising a group buy on AlfaOwner!
|
Frank Bullitt
|
Your experience mirrors that of A2 Sport owners who've had FSD's fitted to replace the horrific dampers Audi send them out with; all the control with the harshness minimised to be of no real concern.
Common concencus appears to be that Audi should send them out from the factory like that but don't calibrate for the UK.
I've thought about them for mine, as they are supposed to make the 'SE' silky smooth, but can't quite justify the cost of it! When mine are on their way out then I'll probably do it then.
|
ALF
|
I've not been in one, but I thought Audi SE's were quite soft anyway? When we were trying to sell the car some prospective buyers had tried similar age A4 SE's and said they were very much softer.
Having felt the results on my S-Line, I'm not sure I'd want the FSD's on SE springs/ARB's - slightly softer dampers often suit stiffer springs (a setup many marques have settled on for the UK) and the FSD's seem well suited to the S-Line setup.
|
Frank Bullitt
|
The A2 SE is still reasonably firm; it's not like the A4 SE I drove which was a bit boat-esque. The A2 SE looses the 'Sport' models harshness, but the lightweight nature of the body means it can pitch on bad roads when 1-up, and broken A-roads can be transmitted through the structure. The benefit over the Sport model is less marked apparantly, but definately there over sharp ridges and scarred tarmac with no loss of precision in the handling and steering.
|
PG
|
| JohnC wrote: | | With all the criticism of the quality of Audi's ride and comfort on British roads you would think they would fit these dampers (or an Audi version of them) as standard. |
I often wonder that about many car components, but I guess it all comes down to cost in the end. For example, when you can buy a perfectly good Recaro, or even use them as consultants to design a branded seat for you, why do car manufacturers insist on designing, building and fitting uncomfortable and ergonomically bad seats? Arrogance I expect, as I doubt all those internal designers are cheap and they have to justify their existence.
|
JohnC
|
Manufacturers even buy and strip down their competitors cars to see how improvements could be made so surely the cost of a few dampers isn't beyond them. For something as central to a cars success as the suspension it defies logic that they haven't done something in this area.
|
ALF
|
When you see how cheaply original OEM dampers can be bought, even sometimes from main dealers, you realise the manufacturers often use very low cost componentseven in such a critical area. Same goes for LSD's - they could buy them for well sub £250 per vehicle and transform the handling, but few do.
When it comes to seats, many VW and Audi seats are actually recaros even if not branded as such - the ones in my Audi definitely are - so some see sense there, at least!
|
GonnaBreakABuggy
|
A set of FSD's will probably cost double what a set of pretty reasonable dampers would to a manufacturer
|
Guitar Zero
|
So - do Koni design and tune sets of FSDs to suit particular makes of car ? - i.e, you specifically order a set for a 156 GTA estate (for example)
|
"him"
|
I doubt it, normally it is a case of std. spec. +25%
|
Guitar Zero
|
So do they do them by model then ? - so Koni will design and tune for a 156, irrespective of engine, body style, spring rates or bushing specs ?
|
GonnaBreakABuggy
|
Pretty much, a digressive damping valve tends to work fairly well across a fairly wide range of spring rate from where it was set, and the FSD in particular alters the rebound and bound based on the damper velocity - fit stiffer springs and it'll hit that velocity slightly sooner, (but the rapid damping rate increase from the digressive valving means the velocity won't be much different) and then the damping curve thereafter is pretty flat anyway.
You'll only start getting properly custom-valved dampers when you start buying Ohlins/Penske/RDC/MVS and the like, or the proper race-series Bilstiens/Avo's.
Or those Fox shox I've just posted in the sticky
|
"him"
|
| GonnaBreakABuggy wrote: | ...Or those Fox shox I've just posted in the sticky  |
Oh be quiet...
My Group N spec. Bilsteins will do for me... I wouldn't know what to do with a set that had any adjustment anyway!
|
GonnaBreakABuggy
|
Pricey from there!
Aw, look at the weenie little 20cc gas pocket, poor bugger.
Mine only take 600cc you know
Want some Foxes, Mr. "him"?
Rear spring rate is adjustable on mine too...
|
"him"
|
...make the nasty man stop!
Muuuum, he is using numbers at me again...
|
GonnaBreakABuggy
|
980cc of synthetic racing oil....
|
PG
|
| GonnaBreakABuggy wrote: | | ...a digressive damping valve tends to work fairly well across a fairly wide range of spring rate from where it was set, and the FSD in particular alters the rebound and bound based on the damper velocity - fit stiffer springs and it'll hit that velocity slightly sooner, (but the rapid damping rate increase from the digressive valving means the velocity won't be much different) and then the damping curve thereafter is pretty flat anyway. |
I'm sorry, my head has exploded.
|
ALF
|
| Guitar Zero wrote: | | So do they do them by model then ? - so Koni will design and tune for a 156, irrespective of engine, body style, spring rates or bushing specs ? |
Not usually. I know what you are going to say - manufacturers do rate them by model ,yadda yadda - well, all I can say is, they don't do a very good job - or more likely their budget does not allow them to do a very good job. Not for the UK anyway.
There is a limited amount of tuning you can do on the FSD's by rotating the arm, GTA 156's were sold as a separate part for this reason - it was the same item, just set up for a slightly lower, stiffer, heavier car. It was only the rears that were changed. But still, on everything from a 1.6 petrol to a GTA, sports suspension and normal, FSD's were a vast improvement, which suggests their auto valving is pretty good at self adjusting.
With the Audi, the same FSD part number covers basically all the B7 A4's, but when you order (from one of the better places, anyway they go through the precise spec in more detail - mine was specified as sports or S-Line suspension - so perhaps they, too, were adjusted for that setup.
|
GonnaBreakABuggy
|
mmm, custom valving:
|
Guitar Zero
|
| Quote: | | Not usually. I know what you are going to say - manufacturers do rate them by model ,yadda yadda - well, all I can say is, they don't do a very good job |
Correction - SOME manufacturers don't do a very good job. Ford and Jaguar are the fucking masters of damping - Mercedes don't appear to be too shabby either.
I would be interested to know how much mileage accumulation Koni do on each model they tune shocks for - it's not really something you can do on a trip to the shops
|
scamper
|
| PG wrote: | | GonnaBreakABuggy wrote: | | ...a digressive damping valve tends to work fairly well across a fairly wide range of spring rate from where it was set, and the FSD in particular alters the rebound and bound based on the damper velocity - fit stiffer springs and it'll hit that velocity slightly sooner, (but the rapid damping rate increase from the digressive valving means the velocity won't be much different) and then the damping curve thereafter is pretty flat anyway. |
I'm sorry, my head has exploded. |
I think i've got most of that on one of my mountain bikes
|
Gurney
|
| Guitar Zero wrote: | | Quote: | | Not usually. I know what you are going to say - manufacturers do rate them by model ,yadda yadda - well, all I can say is, they don't do a very good job |
Correction - SOME manufacturers don't do a very good job. Ford and Jaguar are the fucking masters of damping - Mercedes don't appear to be too shabby either.
I would be interested to know how much mileage accumulation Koni do on each model they tune shocks for - it's not really something you can do on a trip to the shops |
You can add Ferrari & Maserati to that list which makes you wonder why the expertise doesn't filter down the Fiat empire. New Abroath special edition excepted.
Then again it's hardly a surprise
|
Turbonutter
|
I've got Koni adjustables on the Sierra along with some springs developed by a guy who worked/works freelance for Ford SVE/Motorsport and was involved with the original development of the car - he developed them specifically to work with the Koni shocks and compared to standard he's done a pretty good job
They are pretty much the best set-up I've had for the car ( and I've had 2 others apart from standard ).
One of the complaints levelled at the Sapphire Cosworth originally was that it was under-damped - testers complained of "secondary bounce that could unsettle the car when pushed hard".
It would be good if he could try the FSDs and maybe come up with soem springs to suit those
|
Gurney
|
'Under-damped' is what afflicts std GTA's too if I am not mistaken.
I find my FSD equipped example has a perfectly acceptable ride/handling balance but then again I have never driven a std GTA to compare.
|
GonnaBreakABuggy
|
| Gurney wrote: |
You can add Ferrari & Maserati to that list which makes you wonder why the expertise doesn't filter down the Fiat empire. New Abroath special edition excepted.
Then again it's hardly a surprise |
And 80's and 90's Peugeots...
|