Archive for The Motor Forum talking cars since 2006
 


       The Motor Forum Forum Index -> Photography
Rodge

Californography

Here's a few snapshots of the last few weeks I spent in California, all taken with my new compact Panasonic TZ7.
It was a great time, the only rain was in San Francisco but that's to be expected there. The temperature hit 107f in Death valley. 2 days later, it hit 118f so I was glad we'd moved on by then.
Yosemite was brilliant and bettered expectations.
The RV was a pile of turd, and I'd recommend anyone considering a similar trip to go with someone other than Cruise America.

Most cars were underwheeled:


Yosemite




Not many get to see a bear while visiting but we did:


Got colder above 8000 feet


Sunrise in Death Valley


Mixed Signals


The '09 version of the RV


Zoe runs for cover from the rain in Death Valley


Joshua Tree


Twilight


The Turd


Mandatory Duck Photo


Best car ever built (After driving the turd, anything was an improvement)


It was a good break and I was very pleased with how good the camera was, it has a huge range of options on it and even videos in HD.
I've loads more but decided to limit it to a few.

Best bit was Yosemite, worst was driving the Turd (There was loads wrong with it- water leaks, broken cd player, broken 12v supply, dodgy battery, overheating, I could list more- they fixed nothing and I'm waiting for a formal reply to my complaints).
Nicest car spotted, Gullwing Merc and it was probably the most expensive too.
People were very friendly, fuel was around $2.50 an US gallon, food is more expensive there as are clothes since I was last over.
Matt



Isn't she actually running from the UFO in the background


"him"

...towards what would appear to be a huge bear...
Humphrey The Pug

It might be a turd but isn't driving something like that in the States all part of the appeal?

Looks like you had a lovely time, great pictures.

Myself and Tina are really up for something similar as a late, probably very late, honeymoon.
Dr. Hfuhruhurr

Re: Californography

Rodge wrote:

It might be an improvement on the turd, but boy is it ugly! That collapsing feature line along the side - what were they thinking?
DarthBalls

Re: Californography

Dr. Hfuhruhurr wrote:
That collapsing feature line along the side - what were they thinking?


Something like "...if BMW can sell shitloads of 1 series, maybe it's worth a go?"
Rodge

Humphrey The Pug wrote:
It might be a turd but isn't driving something like that in the States all part of the appeal?

Looks like you had a lovely time, great pictures.

Myself and Tina are really up for something similar as a late, probably very late, honeymoon.


The appeal was the thought of driving a V10. The reality was that there's more power in a baby's fart.
It struggled to stay above 25mph on hills and had worse build quality than anything I've driven before. It's no wonder the big 3 are in trouble in the US if they've been making crap like it.

A decent 3 litre diesel would have been much better suited to it than a V10 6.8 litre petrol engine.


The Toyota was a really good car, particularly as there were 5 of us. I didn't even notice the fold lines until now! The 3.5 V6 was quick and had 270 hp and 249 lb/ft of Torque. I've not driven many SUV's recently but it was the best I've driven in the US by a long margin, and was much nicer than the Explorer we were collected in.
Humphrey The Pug

A 6.8 ltr V10 couldn't propel that, god it must have been either extremely heavy or an extremely shit engine, any idea on the power output?
"him"

Humphrey The Pug wrote:
A 6.8 ltr V10 couldn't propel that, god it must have been either extremely heavy or an extremely shit engine, any idea on the power output?

From Wikipedia - "The 6.8 L Triton V10 produced 305 hp and 420 ft·lbf torque"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_E-Series
Dr. Hfuhruhurr

Re: Californography

DarthBalls wrote:
Dr. Hfuhruhurr wrote:
That collapsing feature line along the side - what were they thinking?

Something like "...if BMW can sell shitloads of 1 series, maybe it's worth a go?"

Rodge

"him" wrote:
Humphrey The Pug wrote:
A 6.8 ltr V10 couldn't propel that, god it must have been either extremely heavy or an extremely shit engine, any idea on the power output?

From Wikipedia - "The 6.8 L Triton V10 produced 305 hp and 420 ft·lbf torque"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_E-Series


So comparing it with my own car, it had 4 cylinders more, 4 litres more and 4 valves less, it also gave about 4mpg at times and struggled in 4th gear all the time.

The RV weighed 5,500kg without passengers. There was a weight chart in a cupboard in it listing these specs.
DarthBalls

Re: Californography

Dr. Hfuhruhurr wrote:
DarthBalls wrote:
Dr. Hfuhruhurr wrote:
That collapsing feature line along the side - what were they thinking?

Something like "...if BMW can sell shitloads of 1 series, maybe it's worth a go?"



You knows it true

BTW - Not that I'm complaining. But how come you've reverted to using 'Mild Mannered Mallard' (that's what I called that pic) for your avatar?
       The Motor Forum Forum Index -> Photography
Page 1 of 1