The Motor Forum Forum Index The Motor Forum
talking cars since 2006
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Camera comparisons.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Motor Forum Forum Index -> Photography
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
woof woof
Twin-charged

My Car: Is Red.

Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 9946


Location: Sat on the rug, nice and cosy.

PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:41 am    Post subject: Camera comparisons. Reply with quote

As I've just bought a sexy new camera I thought I'd do some comparisons.

These are round about 100% or so crops but it varied to make them more or less the same size.

1 - 20D, 50mm f1.4 at f8.
2 - GF1, 20mm f1.7 at f4.
3 - LX2 at f4.5.
4 - Ixus 82 at god knows what settings, it says f4.









The Ixus has made a complete mess of it and even at ISO 100 there is noise, plus the exposure seems to be off.

There's obviously some in camera processing going on in the GF1 and the exposure is a little too punchy, but it's still great with lots of detail.

The LX2 does surprisingly well at ISO 100.

The 20D shades them all IMVHO, but the GF1 is bloody good and the LX2 is by no means shabby at base sensitivity.
_________________
woof woof's defence lawyer claimed that "Booze played no part in his typo's."

Confucius says "all reckless speeding is caused by accidents."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SpecB
Turbocharged

My Car: Subaru Legacy 3.0R SpecB

Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Posts: 3107


Location: Home, office, the stables or somewhere in between.

PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I notice a difference between my compact and the SLR.

The Canon compact nearly always produces perfectly exposed shots that are perhaps a bit over-processed.

The Minolta's processing is great but indoors it tends to under expose by up to a stop and the auto white balance is useless.  Outdoors it is fantastic under virtually any light condition.  I have come to the conclusion that artificial light throws it off and quite often bracket when shooting indoors.
_________________


Mark
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
woof woof
Twin-charged

My Car: Is Red.

Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 9946


Location: Sat on the rug, nice and cosy.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why not just leave WB set to auto and shoot RAW? That's what I do.

The GF1 seems to make a better stab at WB than my 20D, which is useless at WB under artificial light. The version of Silkypix I got with the LX2 struggles to correct WB but the new version I got with the GF1 works fine. I've never had a WB issue in natural light.

I was a bit surprised at how badly my IXUS has done here. I suppose that the whole shot doesn't look too bad apart from being a bit dark but the crop shows how much noise is present and of course things will only get worse, at least at 100% or so, if I lighten it. I suppose this just shows that a relatively cheap compact just can't compete with the better stuff or stand up to a heavy crop, even the small sensor LX2 blitzes it.
_________________
woof woof's defence lawyer claimed that "Booze played no part in his typo's."

Confucius says "all reckless speeding is caused by accidents."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Motor Forum Forum Index -> Photography All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group