The Motor Forum

Twelfth Monkey

http://www.pitpass.com/fes_php/pitpass_news_item.php?fes_art_id=39063

Why?
_________________
"Accident Blackspot"? These aren't accidents. They're throwing themselves into the road gladly. Throwing themselves into the road to escape all this hideousness.'

Boxer6 · Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:00 am Post subject:

Why indeed. I thought constant tweakery and innovation, improvements throughout the season etc was what F1 was all about (in a technical sense, at least)

Apparently not, by that article.

_________________
Just keepin' on keeping on.

Sav · Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:32 am Post subject:

I suspect the current V8's will stay in 'spec' configuration until 2013 when a new engine will be introduced (that has not been decided by the FIA yet. I agree though, what is the point of Mercedes developing a marvellous engine only to be told it will be pegged back because the Renault unit is unreliable and the Toyota one lacks power?
_________________

Eff One · Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:15 am Post subject:

I confess I'm a bit bemused by this too - they're all operating to the same limits and Mercedes has done a better job than the others. So surely it's up to them to catch up?
_________________
"Racing is life. Everything before and after is just waiting." Steve McQueen

Big Blue · Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:13 pm Post subject:

What a fucking farce. Pinnacle of motorsport? My arse: there's more technology trying to eek an additional ½bhp from a 125cc bike in a club race!
_________________
Call the fire brigade, call the firebrigade......

I said FireBRIGADE......

Rodge · Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:16 pm Post subject:

So the faster cars will be slower and the slower cars will have a better chance of competing.
Why don't they go the whole hog and add balast to the winner's cars?

Whatever happens, you can be sure that the laptimes in 2013 will be even quicker than they have been this year. The F1 guy's will find a way around the regulations.
_________________

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm...ds.individual&VideoID=2869045

woof woof · Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:25 pm Post subject:

It all makes sense once you accept that it's the FAI's policy to fiddle with the rules and hand out various restrictions, bans , exceptions and levels of punishment to make it more likely that their preferred driver and manufacturer win.
_________________
woof woof's defence lawyer claimed that "Booze played no part in his typo's."

Confucius says "all reckless speeding is caused by accidents."

Rodge · Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 1:44 pm Post subject:

Big TC · Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:37 pm Post subject:

Why not get Cosworth to build all the engines, and the manufacturers are then allowed to call it what they want, and put their own cam-covers on.....

<extracts tongue from cheek>

As far as the regualtions go, surely the governing body could go way further than they have on restricting aerodynamics?
_________________

It's a '57 Pontiac Star Chief, dontchaknow.

cbeaks1 · Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:39 pm Post subject:

DaveGibson · Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:05 pm Post subject:

Mike Amos · Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:56 pm Post subject:

I would summise that they are pegging the best engine in the class so that the new boys will be only a bit behind and Ferrari et al will look less like also rans.

If Jean Todd gets the top seat all will be lost, I sincerely hope a certain ex rally driver get the job.

I still do not have a 'favourite team' but do like to have at least the illusion of fairness. Sad I know.
_________________
Politicians. Would a career specialist by any other name carry such a putrid stench?

Big TC · Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:15 pm Post subject:

If Ferrari's engine was as superior as Merc's seems to be at the moment, would they be able to veto the de-restriction of it to bring it down to the level of their competitor's engines? And we all know the answer to that one....

I too hope that Vatanen gets the FIA top job. Sincerely.
_________________

It's a '57 Pontiac Star Chief, dontchaknow.

Big Blue · Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:25 pm Post subject:

Sorry, Merc's engine alone is NOT superior. The Mclaren was shit all through the first half of the season; the Brawn has been down recently and was only so good at the start of the year because the team started developing the 2009 car in about December 2007; the Force India needed some fundamental redesigns done mid season to be where it is now.
_________________
Call the fire brigade, call the firebrigade......

I said FireBRIGADE......

Big TC · Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:14 am Post subject:

I agree, BB. I've always wondered how 'they' have decided that the Merc is so superior to all the other engines. Aside from bench-testing examples of all engines alongside one another, I don't know how they can tell definitively.
_________________

It's a '57 Pontiac Star Chief, dontchaknow.

Sav · Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:20 am Post subject:

Big Blue · Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:00 am Post subject:

Sav, you've made my point yourself in your own post: the McMerc was shit due to aero issues and if the Force India hadn't been aero-altered for Spa it would have been as shit as it ever was, even if it had 2 Mercedes engines in it.

The Ferrari of Raikkonen was able to stay ahead of the Merc engined Force India due to KERS; I have photographs from the Monza race (I'll post them sometime!) where the Ferrari shat on the Force India off the line due to KERS; F1 isn't an engine-only race and the use of KERS, however good or bad it seems, is a part of the overall technology contest: the Ferrari works with it to some extent.

The Merc engine is bound to be more fuel efficient than the Ferrari: it has less weight to carry! Hamilton demonstrated this at Monza where he had to carry less fuel and stop twice because he has.....KERS (and...er... a Merc engine, like the 2 Brawns)

As to Domenicalli arguing that his competitors' engines should be pegged back: what would you do in his shoes

The Merc engine is good; the Ferrari engine is good. The packages they sit in are vastly different such as to make it difficult to be definitive about which is better.
_________________
Call the fire brigade, call the firebrigade......

I said FireBRIGADE......

Humphrey The Pug · Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:34 am Post subject:

Why though should a better performing engine be "pegged back"?

If the far superior engine was produced to the same rules as an inferior engine then it's the manufacturer of the inferior engine who needs to have a look at their engine and work out where they went wrong.

How far do you go, have standard aero across all of the cars just because one or two manufacturers have managed to produce a car with better aero efficiency than the other guys?
_________________
Mummy, Daddy, Sissy, Sassy Baby.

Sav · Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:46 am Post subject:

I agree with that BB, the days are long gone when engine builders turned to races with 10 bhp more and the main performance gains do come from aerodynamics. But in a way that makes the engine situation even more interesting because tiny differences are making the difference now. Poor RBR for example probably wished they did not have Renault motors this season.

I still think the Mercedes engines were a large contributing factor to many of the Merc-powered cars being fast in the last two races, the aerodynamic confuguration also played a large part in that. But even when engines are frozen that does not stop the fact that engine performance matters a great deal at Spa and Monza, and despite the FIA's willingness to equalize all engines (for whatever reason

) the small differences do make the difference. The Toyota engine for example is apprentley 25 bhp down on the Merc engine according to some sources, showing how some engine builders have just fallen behind. And coincidently, the Toyota-powered cars were near the bottom of the timesheets in Monza.

I would like Autosport or somebody to find out and analysis the different engines in F1 and the traits of each one, because lets remember the V8's orginally were designed when the engine freeze was not in place - so they are bound to be different in certain ways.
_________________

"him" · Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:29 pm Post subject:

DaveGibson · Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:54 pm Post subject:

The engine specs were fixed at the end of 2007, as I recall but last year Renault were deemed to have slipped off the pace as a result of a different interpretation of the term 'frozen'. They had made no changes while other manufacturers had modified parts, allowed for reliability reasons, which just happened to have produced more power. Consequently Renault were allowed to catch up. I recall reading, earlier this year, that Brawn said the Merc engine was producing 60bhp more than the Honda.